Why is the Democratic Progressive Party against the ECFA but there is no economi

For the DPP's ignorance against ECFA, you must have a clear understanding of the following: among the East Asian economies, Japan and South Korea  become an ally and partner relations, means that Asia's strongest economies in East Asia and even in the three economies nations, Singapore has rival, in terms of the impact on Taiwan,China and the East Asian Economic Community, Japan and South Korea to Taiwan's economic impact is very large, once the total group of the Economic Community of the Three nations, after Japan and South Korea among the relief or concessional tariffs on each other, thus making Japan and South Korea each other, the cost of import and export trade, much lower, Taiwan's economy and trade will be exported to Japan and South Korea the most disadvantaged, and because Taiwan, Japan and South Korea if the total group of East Asian Community after the success of pan-East Asian area on the East Asian Community; under the ASEAN and ASEAN plus one and plus three, Taiwan's economy and trade export is tantamount to being isolated, accounting for the largest in the export of Taiwan's exports in the ASEAN, Japan, China and other regions, and the formation customs union with the tariff mechanism for the formation of mutual concessions, Taiwan's foreign trade and the economy is tantamount to a blind alley, which quickly signed on behalf of the ECFA is not too late!

Pan-election against the axis of ECFA, but the DPP with the exception of things did not make constructive suggestions and constructive with the feasibility and economic policy, but the KMT has already signed the MOU and will sign ECFA; Democratic Progressive Party against the country A total of platform against Lien-Hu meeting and oppose the one-China policy and the anti-China, but the DPP itself is not part of the Pan-right of cross-strait policy and in line with the policy, still cling to independence and Taiwan's sovereignty, always talk about independence as long as the The removal of international, pan-green camp there is no phenomenon of Chen Shui-bian cut demonstration of pan-green camp to the general election to Chen Shui-bian and the issue of low-key treatment, pan-green camp abandon its attempt to deceive the people with the Chen Shui-bian Chen Shui-bian and create a false impression that the election of cutting, Xiao-ying(leader of DPP) in the election occasions that Mr. Pang is a stay Thomson, Su Tseng-chang is also studying in Germany but still in the presidential election defeat!

簽ECFA不是在賣台!國民黨不賣台!!

南部人迷信著民進黨的說法，民進黨有一個錯誤說法就是國民黨與中國大陸簽ECFA是賣台，大家必須瞭解到民進黨的說法是錯誤之因，在於依據WTO規範，貿易救濟分為反傾銷措施、補貼暨平衡稅措施及防衛措施等3種。反傾銷及平衡稅措施係針對國際間傾銷及補貼等不公平競爭行為，課徵反傾銷稅及平衡稅，使進口品能與國產品在平等之基礎上公平競爭；防衛措施則係針對進口品急遽增加，採行提高關稅或採行數量限制等措施，以降低進口品對於國內產業產生之衝擊。為兼顧ECFA創造之出口商機及國內產業之利益，未來與中國大陸洽簽ECFA及後續貨品開放協議時，我政府單位將審酌各國與中國大陸洽簽FTA之先例，爭取對中國大陸貨品繼續適用WTO反傾銷、補貼及防衛等協定，以保留並避免弱化我國於WTO下對該等貨品課徵反傾銷稅、平衡稅及採行防衛措施之權利。ECFA適用範圍是在兩岸，簽署者是由台灣與中國協商共同決定，簽署方式採用「架構協議」，截至2009年8月還未與中國就協議「細節」洽談。後續實質內容才要經由談判逐步完成。簽署內容：可能包括商品貿易（排除關稅和非關稅障礙）、服務貿易、投資保障、智慧財產權、防衛措施、經濟合作，以及經貿爭端的解決機制等。ECFA在資金、就業和產業的疑慮已浮現。兩岸若簽署，中國給予台灣優惠較大，反之，台灣開放陸資入台，現有產業體系難免受到衝擊。整體來說，受惠較大的產業為：機械業、化學塑膠橡膠業、紡織業、鋼鐵業，以及石油煤製品業。受負面影響較深產業為：電機電子產品業、運輸工具業、木材製品業，遠景基金會委託中華經濟研究院研究指出，兩岸經貿自由化推估可使台灣GDP增加1.83個百分點，約發放消費券三倍效益。中經院報告顯示，台灣藉此參與區域經濟整合能提高優勢，成為跨國企業進駐地點。國家政策發展基金會科技經濟組召集人林祖嘉也指出，台灣現階段國內投資嚴重不足時，利用此機會可吸引外資流入。

同心協力 再造台灣-催票篇 (國語)

清廉 反貪污 
擺脫惡質選舉 迎接陽光政治
要靠選民的智慧
12月5日
票投支持改革的中國國民黨

相關文章：

成就台灣的幸福 美麗的提升與蛻變

綠色執政 品質?

http://www.kmt.org.tw/hc.aspx?id=41&aid=4033